Three provinces, one code, three different rulebooks
Ontario and Alberta are on the same edition right now. British Columbia is on one neither of them has ever adopted. Alberta moves again in 2027.
Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta all run the same code — ASME A17.1 / CSA B44 — and all three are in a different place with it. Two of them match right now. The third has not matched either since 2020. This is when they lined up, when they didn’t, and what that means on the job.
Everything here is drawn from the three provincial timelines on this site, each sourced to the regulations and regulator documents behind it: British Columbia, Ontario and Alberta.
The question this page answers: if you work across provincial lines, are you on the same code book?
Ontario and Alberta are on the same edition right now. Both run the 2019 code. Ontario has run it as B44:19 since 2022, Alberta as B44-19 since 1 December 2022. This is the first time in this record that two of these three provinces have matched and stayed matched.
British Columbia is on neither. BC has run B44-16 since 2020, an edition neither Ontario nor Alberta has ever adopted. It is not behind them; it is somewhere they have never been.
All three did match, twice. Briefly on B44-00 from 2003, and again on B44-07 from 2010 to 2012. Both windows closed when Ontario moved first.
The next change is Alberta’s, and it is a big one. Alberta refused the 2022 edition outright and is scheduled to move straight to the 2025 code on 1 February 2027. That takes it away from Ontario again, and lands two editions’ worth of change at once.
Which edition each province was on
Green rows are the stretches when a mechanic could carry the same book across all three provinces and be right everywhere. There have been two, and the last one ended in 2012. The amber row is today: two provinces agree, one does not.
| Period | Ontario | British Columbia | Alberta | Where they stood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| before 2002 | B44-94 | B44-94 | not recorded | Alberta’s published record does not reach back this far |
| 2002 – 2003 | B44-00 | B44-94 | not recorded | Ontario moves first |
| Aug 2003 – 2006 | B44-00 | B44-00 | B44-00 | all three on the same book |
| 2006 – 2007 | B44-04 | B44-00 | B44-00 | Ontario moves first again |
| 2007 – 2008 | B44-04 | B44-04 | B44-00 | Alberta now the odd one out |
| 2008 – May 2009 | B44-07 | B44-04 | B44-00 | three provinces, three editions |
| May 2009 – 2010 | B44-07 | B44-04 | B44-07 | Alberta skips B44-04 entirely |
| 2010 – 2012 | B44-07 | B44-07 | B44-07 | all three on the same book — the last time |
| 2012 – Mar 2016 | B44-10 | B44-07 | B44-07 | BC and Alberta never adopt B44-10 |
| Mar 2016 – 2020 | B44-10 | B44-07 | B44-13 | Ontario never adopts B44-13 |
| 2020 – Dec 2022 | B44-10 | B44-16 | B44-13 | three provinces, three editions again |
| Dec 2022 – today | B44:19 | B44-16 | B44-19 | Ontario and Alberta agree; BC does not |
| from 1 Feb 2027 scheduled | B44:19 | B44-16 | B44:25 | Alberta moves ahead of both |
Each province handles the same code differently
Set the three records side by side and what emerges is not one province lagging another. It is three different working habits, each consistent over twenty years.
Adopts nearly everything
B44-94, B44-00, B44-04, B44-07, B44-10, then B44:19. Ontario has taken up almost every edition published, and its record reaches back to 1954. It has skipped two in this window: B44-13 and B44-16.
Adopts every other one, steadily
B44-00, B44-07, B44-13, B44-19, and B44:25 scheduled. Roughly one edition in two, at a remarkably even interval of six to seven years. The most predictable of the three.
Moves rarely, then jumps
B44-94, B44-00, B44-04, B44-07, then nothing for ten years before jumping to B44-16 in 2020. When BC moves it skips whatever accumulated in between rather than working through it.
That is why “BC is a few years behind” is the wrong model. For most of the 2000s the relationship was a lag: BC trailed Ontario by 13, 14 and then 35 months, and caught up each time. On 1 May 2012 Ontario moved to B44-10 and BC stayed put, and BC has never closed a gap since. Its next move will almost certainly be another jump.
Alberta’s habit produces a different effect. Because it takes every other edition, it lands on the same book as Ontario roughly half the time by arithmetic rather than by coordination, which is exactly what has happened now, and what will stop happening again on 1 February 2027.
Three other things that differ
How many books are adopted. Ontario adopts the most: the core code, the suspension and governor standard (A17.6-2017), the performance-based code (A17.7 / B44.7-07) as an alternative route where the prescriptive rules cannot be met, and the wind turbine tower elevator standard (A17.8 / B44.8), with electrical equipment required to be certified to B44.1 / A17.5. It does not adopt the . BC adopts the same two elevator books — the core code and the performance-based code, paragraphs (a) and (g) of its regulation’s schedule — but the : it also names manlifts, platform lifts, ropeways, personnel hoists and amusement rides, at editions far older than Alberta’s. Alberta’s regulation names a different set again: the core code plus three companion books for manlifts (B311-24), platform lifts (B355:24) and personnel hoists (Z185:23). A17.6 reaches Alberta through the core code’s own reference to it rather than by separate adoption.
What a date means. BC picks a date and switches. Ontario’s adoptions carry an issue date and a separate effective date four to six months later, and the trigger is usually when the design was submitted, not when the work happens. Alberta names a single in-force date in a numbered regulation. But since 2021 its rule is that a code binds automatically twelve months after publication unless the Minister says otherwise, and the Minister has now overridden that twice on the same edition.
Whether a refusal is announced. BC has skipped three editions in a row without ever saying so. You find out by reading the regulation and noticing what is absent. Alberta published a notice stating that the 2022 edition “will not come into force,” and why. Same outcome, completely different amount of warning.
What this actually costs you
A design signed off in one province is not automatically legal in another. Ontario and Alberta work is currently engineered to the same edition, which is genuinely useful, but that alignment is an accident of timing, not a policy, and it ends on 1 February 2027. BC work is engineered to B44-16 throughout.
For a national contractor that is two design baselines today and three from 2027. For a mechanic moving between provinces it means the edition you know is the edition you knew in the province you left. Check the jurisdiction every time; waiting for the country to converge is waiting for something that has happened twice since 2003 and never lasted more than three years.
Where these dates come from
Every date above is taken from one of the three provincial timelines, each of which cites the regulation or regulator document behind each entry. Nothing here is asserted without a source on the page it came from.
- This page compares three provinces, not thirteen. Ontario, BC and Alberta are the three whose records we have gone through in full. We have not done the same work for the other ten jurisdictions, so nothing here should be read as a claim about Canada as a whole.
- The three-way comparison is only firm from August 2003. Ontario’s record reaches back to 1954 and BC’s to the 1990s, but Alberta’s published bulletins begin with the regulation that took effect on 1 August 2003. The first two rows show Alberta as not recorded rather than guessing.
- The 2027 row is scheduled, not law. Alberta’s own notice says “if the 2025 edition is adopted as anticipated.” The 2022 edition had a date once too, and then did not arrive.
- This will change. BC has not adopted a new edition since 2020, and Alberta moves in 2027. Either event rewrites the headline here. Dates verified 8 August 2026.
- This is a research summary, not legal advice. For a binding answer about a specific unit, ask the authority having jurisdiction in that province.